Last Updated: June 8, 2024
No matter how harmonious your beginnings, or how wonderfully you handle disagreements most of the time, sooner or later it is likely that your neighborhood association will encounter real conflict. The alternative is to wither and die because the meetings become too bland when any hint of disagreement is dismissed and ignored.
In our experience, a low-conflict neighborhood association often is situated in a relatively problem-free area or one that does not perceive its problems, so that is a possible reason for lack of conflict as well. On this page, we deal with a scenario in which there is some actual disagreement, whether it is out in the open or hovering beneath the surface.
Three types of conflict typically arise in neighborhood associations. Handled poorly, any one of these could split you apart.
First, often neighborhood conflict spills over into the neighborhood association. In fact, I am trying hard but I can't remember a time when a neighborhood association I worked with was immune to picking up on a generalized neighborhood conflict.
If this happens to you, factions may develop within your organization and cause enough hard feelings that people don't want to participate in your activities, at least for the duration of the broader debate. Alternatively, if the neighborhood organization is aligned behind one position, and strong people or groups within the community take an opposing view, this causes stress in your association and might focus it unproductively on winning an argument instead of addressing real problems. Either way, major neighborhood conflict can present a challenge.
Second, conflict may develop due to different styles
within the organization. Examples would
be the older folks want traditional meetings and paper newsletters, while the
younger residents want the organization to exist primarily or only through social media and digital communication. Old timers in the organization want to keep
the traditional logo, historic meeting place, and same parties, while
the newer residents have a different style, want what they perceive to be
higher quality graphics, think all communication should run on social media, like to socialize at trendy restaurants instead of the
church basement, and so forth.
Third, conflict may develop because of so-called personality conflicts between key leaders in your organization. I find that fairly often personality conflicts are really work style conflicts. Either way, sometimes these will be so strong that you begin to develop the Judith faction and the Michael faction, not really based on issues or even work styles, but just based on who people like more.
Resolving any of these conflicts enough that they do not sap the energy of neighborhood associations requires effort on the part of the board, president, or a strong leader or elder statesman. Helpful approaches include:
When things really blow up, your neighborhood association might want to consult with a local conflict resolution center. This is likely available to you if you are in a major city or university town. This could be especially evaluable if your association is engaged in an external fight, such as with a developer or a major slum landlord. If you are loggerheads internally, you could try this method of conflict resolution as well.
In really extreme cases, look for a paid mediator. In my experience, this is only relevant when some substantial money is involved. However, it was helpful in a case in which a board member also was the landlord.
Join GOOD COMMUNITY PLUS, which provides you monthly with short features or tips about timely topics for neighborhoods, towns and cities, community organizations, and rural or small town environments. Unsubscribe any time. Give it a try.